Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Vol. 12 Núm. 45 (2018)

Artículos

Asociaciones conceptuales, prácticas, críticas y de tendencia en la co-creación de valor: una revisión sistemática de literatura (RSL)

  • Olga Lucía Hurtado Cardona

Olga Lucía Hurtado Cardona
Fundación Universitaria Comfamiliar Risaralda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23878/empr.v12i45.125

PDF

Resumen

El propósito de este trabajo es realizar una revisión sistemática de los documentos que caracterizan el uso de análisis estadísticos en torno a la co-creación de valor con el fin de encontrar puntos comunes y divergentes, identificando tendencias de investigación y temas de controversia. La metodología está basada en el análisis de tres bases de datos especializadas tales como Scopus, Web of Science y Publish or Perish, de las cuales se obtuvieron datos y documentos para evaluar su calidad y contenido. Los resultados determinan el surgimiento de elementos que involucran conceptos, prácticas y críticas asociadas a la co-creación de valor. También emerge una discusión alrededor del término co-tendencias, que conlleva a ampliar la mirada de este proceso del marketing en otras situaciones y actores intervinientes en los sistemas de servicio. Las asociaciones realizadas permiten identificar nuevos enfoques en la aplicación del marketing para una efectiva gestión de las organizaciones. Finalmente, se concluye sobre la necesidad de encontrar nuevos mecanismos para la aplicación y significación de la co-creación de valor teniendo en cuenta la participación de distintos stakeholders.

Palabras clave

co-creación de valor, revisión sistemática de literatura, co-tendencias, prácticas de co-creación, críticas en co-creación de valor

Biografía del autor/a

Olga Lucía Hurtado Cardona

Docente asociada de la Fundación Universitaria Comfamiliar Risaralda. Estudiante de doctorado en Administración, Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Manizales,

Citas

  1. Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Jaakkola, E. (2012). Value co-creation in knowledge intensive business services: A dyadic perspective on the joint problem solving process. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.11.008
  2. Akaka, M. A., Corsaro, D., Kelleher, C., Maglio, P. P., Seo, Y., Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. (2014). The role of symbols in value co-creation. Marketing Theory, 14(3), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593114534344
  3. Akesson, M., Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., Åkesson, M., Edvardsson, B., & ... (2014). Customer experience from a self-service system perspective. Journal of service management, 25(5, SI), 677–698. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-01-2013-0016
  4. Andajani, E. (2015). Understanding Customer Experience. Management in Retailing. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211 (November 2015), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.082
  5. Bolderston, Amanda. (2008). Writing an effective Literature Review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Volume 39 (2), 86 – 92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2008.04.009
  6. Bovill, C. (2015). Students and staff co-creating curricula: an example of good practice in higher education? In E. G. P. Limited (Ed.), The Student Engagement Handbook: Practice in Higher Education. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
  7. Chan, K. W., Yim, C. K., & Lam, S. S. K. (2010). Is customer participation in value creation a double-edged sword? Evidence from professional financial services across cultures. Journal of Marketing. Retrieved from http://journals.ama.org/doi/abs/10.1509/jmkg.74.3.48
  8. Chandler, J. D., & Lusch, R. F. (2015). Service Systems: A Broadened Framework and Research Agenda on Value Propositions, Engagement, and Service Experience. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514537709
  9. Chen, Y., Spohrer, J., & Lelescu, A. (2008). Three factors to sustainable service system excellence: A case study of service systems. Services Computing, 2008 …. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/4578516/
  10. Cova, B., & Salle, R. (2008). Marketing solutions in accordance with the S-D logic: Co-creating value with customer network actors. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(3), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.07.005
  11. Dong, B., & Sivakumar, K. (2017). Customer participation in services: domain, scope, and boundaries. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(6, SI), 944–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0524-y
  12. Echeverri, P., Skålén, P., & Skálen, P. (2011). Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formation. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111408181
  13. Edvardsson, B., Skålén, P., & Tronvoll, B. (2012). Service systems as a foundation for resource integration and value co-creation. Review of Marketing Research, 9, 79–126. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1548-6435(2012)0000009008
  14. Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B. (2013). A new conceptualization of service innovation grounded in S-D logic and service systems. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 5(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691311316220
  15. Finsterwalder, J. (2018). A 360-degree view of actor engagement in service co-creation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 276–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.08.005
  16. Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011). A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111095676
  17. Frow, P., Nenonen, S., Payne, A., & ... (2015). Managing co‐creation design: A strategic approach to innovation. British Journal of Management, 26, 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12087
  18. Greer, D. A. (2015). Defective co-creation Developing a typology of consumer dysfunction in professional services. European journal of marketing, 49(1–2), 238–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2012-0411
  19. Grönroos, C. (2011). Value co-creation in service logic: A critical analysis. Marketing Theory, 11(3, SI), 279–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111408177
  20. Grönroos, C. (2015). From Marketing Mix to Relationship Marketing: towards a paradigm shift in marketing. Management Decision, 32(2), 4–20.
  21. Grönroos, C., & Gummerus, J. (2014). The service revolution and its marketing implications: service logic vs service-dominant logic. Managing Service Quality, 24(3), 206–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-03-2014-0042
  22. Grönroos, C., & Ravald, A. (2011). Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing. Journal of Service Management, 22 (January 2014), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231111106893
  23. Gummesson, E. (2012). The three service marketing paradigms: which one are you guided by? Stockholm: FrancoAngeli. https://doi.org/10.3280/MC2012-001001
  24. Hilton, T., Hughes, T., & Chalcraft, D. (2012). Service co-creation and value realisation. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(13–14), 1504–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.736874
  25. Jaakkola, E., & Alexander, M. (2014). The Role of Customer Engagement Behavior in Value Co-Creation: A Service System Perspective. Journal of Service Research, 17(3), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514529187
  26. Jadika, K., Khoo, C., & Na, J. (2011). Literature Review Writing: A Study of Information Selection from Cited Papers. In Asia Pacific Conference Library & Information Education & Practice (pp. 467–477).
  27. Laamanen, M., & Skalen, P. (2015). Collective-conflictual value co-creation: A strategic action field approach. Marketing Theory, 15(3), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593114564905
  28. Lusch, R. F., & Webster Jr., F. E. (2011). A Stakeholder-Unifying, cocreation philosophy for marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 31(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146710397369
  29. McColl-Kennedy, J. R., Vargo, S. L., Dagger, T. S., Sweeney, J. C., & van Kasteren, Y. (2012). Health Care Customer Value Cocreation Practice Styles. Journal of Service Research, 15(4), 370–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670512442806
  30. Meyer, C., & Schwager, A. (2007). Understanding Customer Experience. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242539410067746
  31. Meynhardt, T., Chandler, J. D., & Strathoff, P. (2016). Systemic principles of value co-creation: Synergetics of value and service ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2981–2989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.031
  32. Murphy, C. M. (2012). Writing an Effective Review Article. Journal of Medical Toxicology, 8(2), 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-012-0234-2
  33. Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Literature Review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
  34. Payne, A., Storbacka, K., Frow, P., & Knox, S. (2009). Co-creating brands: Diagnosing and designing the relationship experience. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.013
  35. Pine II, B. . J., & Gilmore, J. H. . (1998). Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Business Review, 4 (August), 97–105. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299292969_The_Experience_Economy
  36. Plé, L. (2016). Studying customers’ resource integration by service employees in interactional value co-creation. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-02-2015-0065
  37. Plé, L., & Cáceres, R. C. (2010). Not always co-creation: introducing interactional co-destruction of value in service-dominant logic. Journal of Services Marketing, (June 2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041011072546
  38. Polese, F., Mele, C., & Gummesson, E. (2017). Value co-creation as a complex adaptive process. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 27(5), 926–929. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-07-2017-0111
  39. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review. USA.
  40. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2003). The new frontier of experience innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(4), 12–18. Retrieved from https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-new-frontier-of-experience-innovation/
  41. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004a). Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4–9. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~jhm/Readings/Co-creating unique value with customers.pdf
  42. Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004b). Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20015
  43. Randolph, Justus. (2009). A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(13).
  44. Ranjan, K. R., & Read, S. (2014). Value co-creation: concept and measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 290–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0397-2
  45. Saarijärvi, H. (2012). The mechanisms of value co-creation. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20(5), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2012.671339
  46. Scimago Journal and Country Rank. Available at: https://www.scimagojr.com/
  47. Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2008). The emergence of service science: Toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co‐creation of value. Production and Operations Management, 17(3), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.3401/poms.1080.0027
  48. Suter, G. W. (2013). Review papers are important and worth writing. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 32(9), 1929–1930. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2316
  49. Terblanche, N. S. (2014). Some theoretical persp
  50. ectives of co-creation and co-production of value by customers. Acta Commercii, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/ac.v14i2.237
  51. Vargo, S. L., & Akaka, M. A. (2009). Service-dominant logic as a foundation for service science: clarifications. Service Science, 1(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.1.1.32
  52. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Service dominant logic. Journal of Marketing, 1–20.
  53. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
  54. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2017). Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.001
  55. Vargo, S. L., Maglio, P. P., & Akaka, M. A. (2008). On value and value co-creation: A service systems and service logic perspective. European Management Journal, 26, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.04.003
  56. Vega-Vazquez, M., Revilla-Camacho, M. Á., & Cossío-Silva, F. J. (2013). The value co-creation process as a determinant of customer satisfaction. Management Decision, 51, 1945–1953. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2013-0227
  57. Verhoef, P. C., Lemon, K. N., Parasuraman, A., Roggeveen, A., Tsiros, M., & Schlesinger, L. A. (2009). Customer experience creation: determinants, dynamics and management strategies. Journal of Retailing, 85(1), 31–41.
  58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.11.001
  59. Zhuang, W. (2010). Balancing customer and marketing inputs to maximize the value experience. PhD Thesis, Department of Marketing and Analysis, Louisiana Tech University.
  60. Zwick, D., Bonsu, S. K., & Darmody, A. (2008). Putting consumers to work: “Co-creation” and new marketing govern-mentality. Journal of Consumer Culture, 8(2), 163–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540508090089

El derecho de autor se conserva en los autores de la revista. Garantían también su derecho para publicar artículos científicos e investigativos. Todos los artículos están reconocidos a través de una licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons, donde permite compartir a terceros, siempre y cuando indique al autor y la primera publicación de la revista empresarial, sin fines comerciales.

Los autores se rigen a las diferentes normas de la licencia de no exclusiva, para distribución de la versión en obras publicadas, siempre y cuando se indique la primera publicación de la revista empresarial.

 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.